Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

SOPA Emergency IP list

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • SOPA Emergency IP list

    The Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA), also known as H.R. 3261, is a bill that was introduced in the United States House of Representatives on October 26, 2011, by Representative Lamar Smith (R-TX) and a bipartisan group of 12 initial co-sponsors. The bill expands the ability of U.S. law enforcement and copyright holders to fight online trafficking in copyrighted intellectual property and counterfeit goods. Now before the House Judiciary Committee, it builds on the similar PRO-IP Act of 2008 and the corresponding Senate bill, the PROTECT IP Act.

    The originally proposed bill would allow the U.S. Department of Justice, as well as copyright holders, to seek court orders against websites accused of enabling or facilitating copyright infringement. Depending on who requests the court orders, the actions could include barring online advertising networks and payment facilitators such as PayPal from doing business with the allegedly infringing website, barring search engines from linking to such sites, and requiring Internet service providers to block access to such sites.

    The bill would make unauthorized streaming of copyrighted content a crime, with a maximum penalty of five years in prison for 10 pieces of music or movies within six months. The bill also gives immunity to Internet services that voluntarily take action against websites dedicated to infringement, while making liable for damages any copyright holder who knowingly misrepresents that a website is dedicated to infringement.

    Proponents of the bill say it protects the intellectual property market and corresponding industry, jobs and revenue, and is necessary to bolster enforcement of copyright laws especially against foreign websites. They cite examples such as the DOJ's $500 million settlement with Google for its role in a scheme to target U.S. consumers with ads to buy illegal prescription drugs from Canadian pharmacies.

    Opponents say that it infringes on First Amendment rights, is Internet censorship, will cripple the Internet, and will threaten whistle-blowing and other free speech.

    The House Judiciary Committee held hearings on SOPA on November 16 and December 15, 2011. The Committee is scheduled to continue debate when Congress returns from its winter recess.

    SOPA Emergency IP list:

    If these asshats in D.C. decide to ruin the Internet, here's how to access your favorite sites in the event of a DNS takedown:

    tumblr.com 174.121.194.34
    wikipedia.org 208.80.152.201

    # News
    bbc.co.uk 212.58.241.131
    aljazeera.com 198.78.201.252

    # Social media
    reddit.com 72.247.244.88
    imgur.com 173.231.140.219
    google.com 74.125.157.99
    youtube.com 74.125.65.91
    yahoo.com 98.137.149.56
    hotmail.com 65.55.72.135
    bing.com 65.55.175.254
    digg.com 64.191.203.30
    theonion.com 97.107.137.164
    hush.com 65.39.178.43
    gamespot.com 216.239.113.172
    ign.com 69.10.25.46
    cracked.com 98.124.248.77
    sidereel.com 144.198.29.112
    github.com 207.97.227.239

    # Torrent sites
    mininova.com 80.94.76.5
    btjunkie.com 93.158.65.211
    demonoid.com 62.149.24.66
    demonoid.me 62.149.24.67

    # Social networking
    facebook.com 69.171.224.11
    twitter.com 199.59.149.230
    tumblr.com 174.121.194.34
    livejournal.com 209.200.154.225
    dreamwidth.org 69.174.244.50

    # Live Streaming Content
    stickam.com 67.201.54.151
    blogtv.com 84.22.170.149
    justin.tv 199.9.249.21
    chatroulette.com 184.173.141.231
    omegle.com 97.107.132.144
    own3d.tv 208.94.146.80
    megavideo.com 174.140.154.32

    # Television
    gorillavid.com 178.17.165.74
    videoweed.com 91.220.176.248
    novamov.com 91.220.176.248
    tvlinks.com 208.223.219.206
    1channel.com 208.87.33.151

    # Shopping
    amazon.com 72.21.211.176
    newegg.com 216.52.208.187
    frys.com 209.31.22.39

    # File Sharing
    mediafire.com 205.196.120.13
    megaupload.com 174.140.154.20
    fileshare.com 208.87.33.151
    multiupload.com 95.211.149.7
    uploading.com 195.191.207.40
    hotfile.com 199.7.177.218
    gamespy.com 69.10.25.46
    what.cd 67.21.232.223
    putlocker.com 89.238.130.247
    uploaded.to 95.211.143.200
    dropbox.com 199.47.217.179
    pastebin.com 69.65.13.216


    Here’s a tip for the do-it-yourself crowd: Go to your computer’s Start menu, and either go to “run” or just search for “cmd.” Open it up, and type in “ping [website address],”

    Once you have the IP for a website, all you really need to do is enter it like you would a normal URL and hit enter/press go. Typing in “208.85.240.231” should bring you to the front page of AO3, for example, just as typing “174.121.194.34/dashboard” should bring you straight to your Tumblr dashboard. Since we’re obviously bracing for the worst case scenario which would involve you not being able to access the Internet regularly, you should save this list.
    The Hackmaster

  • #2
    can i copy and paste your post at other messageboards? if i don't then my friends at other boards will not go to Facebook or Google anymore if those lameass bills passes
    Last edited by Sly Hedgehog; 01-04-2012, 10:59:04 AM.

    Comment


    • #3
      Yes, feel free to copy and paste it.
      The Hackmaster

      Comment


      • #4
        Google, Amazon, Twitter and Facebook consider 'nuclear' blackout

        By Charlie Osborne

        Summary: Internet giants are considering a ‘nuclear option’ against the SOPA bill. Should they press the button internationally?

        The online war against SOPA is reaching new levels. In the aftermath of the Reddit ‘Boycott Go Daddy’ campaign, now a number of Internet giants are considering their own moves in the SOPA game.

        Wikipedia was the first to consider a blackout of their services, in order to demonstrate what SOPA could potentially do to any website that allowed user-generated content. Now, a number of sites including Google, Facebook, Twitter and Amazon are considering coordinated downtime on their platforms.


        (Source: ZDNet)

        Markham Erickson of NetCoalition recently confirmed that the extreme move was “under consideration” by the Internet companies. The director commented:

        “This type of thing doesn’t happen because companies typically don’t want to put their users in that position. The difference is that these bills so fundamentally change the way the Internet works. People need to understand the effect this special-interest legislation will have on those who use the Internet.”
        The “nuclear option” will cause major Internet service providers to go simultaneously in to the dark in a coordinated effort to show their displeasure at the proposed legislation.

        However, a move of these proportions will no doubt have severe consequences. Consumer anger, backlash from online users, lost revenue and perhaps catalyst user boycotts as a reprisal may be on the cards.

        Whereas Wikipedia asking its online community what they thought about a blackout yielded some interesting results, it did not get full press attention. A service suspension of Google, however, would no doubt end up blasted across every newspaper in the West within minutes.

        I would not be impressed if one morning if I wake to find Google, Twitter and Facebook are denying access to their domains. I’ll admit, I would become furious. If this suspension goes ahead, the companies better make sure they explain to the general public why this is happening.

        What better way to expose the farcical bill, and ensure that user anger is cajoled in to the right directions?

        If it goes ahead, taking Google as an example, I’m all for it. Something I’ve found as a London-based blogger is that no-one in Britain knows anything about the act whatsoever. They need this.

        I’m expecting commentary, as I’ve witness across the web, stating that service blackouts should only affect the American community. That, in a nutshell, is why ‘nuclear’ options need to affect every international domain. This legislation, in one country, is enough reason to press the nuclear button.

        SOPA is not legislation that will be confined within U.S borders — so in order to ’spread the word’, go ahead. It is time to light the fires of anger that many informed U.S citizens already feel, so members of Congress understand what the SOPA legislation may do to international relationships as well as altering the opinions of the general public.

        There is currently no released formal decision on the matter. However, considering the Senate is scheduled to resume debating the bill on January 24, it may be before this date that the internet giants potentially most affected will choose to make a stand.

        Press the button. You’ll be forgiven for a day’s worth of inconvenience if it can achieve some damage limitation in regards to the SOPA bill.
        The Hackmaster

        Comment


        • #5
          I'm all for the temporary blackout all over the place. While the sites are down or when the sites come back online they should have a tiny article on why they did it. It will make people aware of this evil law.
          Last edited by bungholio; 01-05-2012, 12:24:39 PM.
          July 7, 2019

          https://www.4shared.com/s/fLf6qQ66Zee
          https://www.sendspace.com/file/jvsdbd

          Comment


          • #6
            Rock, Paper, Shotgun's Big SOPA List

            Rock, Paper, Shotgun has put together a nice little list of where each member of the ESA stands on SOPA. While many of the member companies have not responded, the list shows that - when pressed - many don't support it.

            Here’s a guide to ESA members and their current positions on the Stop Online Piracy Act. RPS has called for all members to publicly denounce the dangerous and censorious bill. If we know a company’s position, we’ll state it below. If we’re waiting to hear back from them, you’ll see just “Contacted”.

            Here goes:

            38 Studios

            Against. Rather quietly in a comment on Facebook, they have expressed they are not in favor of the current version of the Bill.

            345 Games

            Contacted. However, they are owned by Viacom, who have publicly supported the Act.

            505 Games

            Contacted.

            Capcom USA, Inc.

            Undeclared. According to Digital Trends, Capcom told them that they support SOPA. However, since then Capcom have issued a statement explaining the rather woolly position that the ESA represents them, but they don’t have a position themselves. I’m pretty sure that’s meant to work the other way around. They also get very pissy that people interpreted their saying that the ESA represents them as meaning they agree with the ESA stance, calling it “bad journalism”. Think they might want to turn that pissy attitude inward there, and think a bit more carefully. And have the balls to say what they think as a company. Because statements like this:
            “At Capcom, we’re game makers, not legislators. We do not have an internal stance on this particular issue and are not planning to. We’ll get back to making games. Thanks.”
            Deep Silver

            Contacted.

            Disney Interactive Studios, Inc.

            Contacted. However, Disney Publishing Worldwide, Inc. is listed in favor of the bill, as is their television arm, ABC.

            Eidos Interactive

            See Square Enix

            Electronic Arts

            Undeclared. Currently they are not actively supporting the bill, but after a few websites got themselves a bit confused over this, it’s not clear if they’ve specifically come out against it.

            We've also received a tip from theorigin.de that tells us EA have said,
            “there is no political comment on the part of EA (neither one way or the other).”
            So yet another company not willing to take a stand, either way.

            Epic Games, Inc.

            Against. They posted on their forum on the 4th Jan to make it clear they do not support the Act in its current form.

            Her Interactive, Inc.

            Contacted.

            Ignition Entertainment

            Contacted.

            Konami Digital Entertainment

            Contacted.

            LEVEL-5 Inc.

            Contacted.

            Microsoft Corporation

            Contacted. But a confusing one. As a member of the ESA they’re de facto supporting it, but as a member of the BSA they’re automatically against it. Erk.

            Namco Bandai Games America Inc.

            Contacted.

            Natsume Inc.

            Contacted.

            Nexon America, Inc.

            Undeclared. Nexon got back to us to say, “At this point, we are not taking a public position this issue.”

            Nintendo of America Inc.

            Extremely difficult to contact. Caught up in the same confusion as EA, Sony, et al, they never did support the bill, but aren’t listed as currently supporting.

            Nival

            Against. Nival have gotten back to us with a statement explaining that they do not support the SOPA, and saying they’ve contacted the ESA to inform them too.
            “Nival does not support SOPA, despite a deep understanding of the struggle against piracy in the games industry. Unfortunately, SOPA could do more harm to Internet freedom than good to fight piracy. We recognize the issues our partners in the online press have with this legislation. We will continue to be anti-piracy but are also anti-SOPA.”
            NVIDIA

            Contacted.

            O-Games, Inc.

            Contacted.

            Perfect World Entertainment

            Contacted.

            SEGA of America, Inc.

            Contacted.

            Slang

            Contacted.

            Sony Computer Entertainment America

            See Sony Online Entertainment, Inc.

            Sony Online Entertainment, Inc.

            Contacted. Sony is in an odd position, where Sony/ATV Music Publishing, Sony Music Entertainment, and Sony Music Nashville are all listed as in support of the bill, while SOE and SCAE are not.

            Square Enix, Inc.

            Contacted.

            Take-Two Interactive Software, Inc.

            Contacted. Possibly against. We’ve had an insider at 2K tip us off that Take-Two’s VP, Alan Lewis, could be against SOPA. Nothing concrete though.

            Tecmo Koei America Corporation

            Contacted.

            THQ, Inc.

            Undeclared. THQ got in touch to say they “don’t have an individual statement on this”, but encouraged us to pursue a statement from the ESA. We are, of course.

            Trion Worlds, Inc.

            Against. Scott Hartsmann posted to the Trion forums saying,
            “Hi, folks – Extremely quick reply since I’m out on vacation: We definitely do not support SOPA.

            We’ll be calling the ESA about this after the holiday weekend.”
            Thanks Ten Ton Hammer.

            Ubisoft Entertainment, Inc.

            Contacted.

            Warner Bros. Interactive Entertainment Inc.

            In the process of contacting. Although it’s worth noting that Warner Music Group and Warner Music Nashville are listed supporting the bill, and that overall owners, Time Warner, are one of the big funders here.

            XSEED Games

            Contacted.
            Last edited by dlevere; 01-06-2012, 08:06:10 AM.
            The Hackmaster

            Comment


            • #7
              DNS provision pulled from SOPA, victory for opponents.
              The Hackmaster

              Comment


              • #8
                hope you don't mind i posted this link..

                a very good news for you SOPA haters as i am-

                http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology...cy-legislation

                Comment


                • #9
                  SOPA Shelved - But What About Protect IP

                  Written by Sue Gee
                  Monday, 16 January 2012 14:50

                  Congress has put off action on SOPA. Although there is no explanation, I think we can attribute this to pressure from online petitioners and strike action threatened by Reddit and other prominent websites.

                  Update:
                  Wikipedia joins blackout. A community vote is still being taken about what will happen but at the moment the plan is to redirect to an "education" site.

                  The decision to shelve the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) was announced on Saturday morning by congressman Darrell Issa, one of the bill's opponents, who said that he had been been told by House majority leader Eric Cantor that there would be no vote on it "unless there is consensus on the bill."
                  The Hackmaster

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    SOPA is officially postponed indefenitely

                    http://www.gamepolitics.com/2012/01/...ndefinitely039

                    you read that right!!
                    Last edited by Sly Hedgehog; 01-20-2012, 01:06:16 PM.

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X