Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Ad-blocking software is costing websites real money

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Ad-blocking software is costing websites real money

    A new report released Monday says ad blocking will cost online businesses nearly $22 billion worldwide, and it will only get worse in the coming years.

    By Ian Paul



    Ad-blocking software is on the rise, and it's no surprise why. People are fed up with advertising networks that track you across the Internet and sites littered with ads. Ad-blocking software helps users reclaim their privacy and enjoy a calmer Internet browsing experience.

    Blocking too many ads, though, can starve the very sites users visit. A new report released Monday says ad blocking will cost online businesses nearly $22 billion worldwide, and it will only get worse in the coming years. By 2016 ad blockers are expected to result in an estimated loss of $20.3 billion in the U.S. alone.

    Adobe teamed up with Ireland-based start-up PageFair to assess the current use of ad-blocking software. For online sites that rely on advertising, including this one, the future appears to be full of challenges.


    Adobe/PageFair

    In the United States — one of the most important markets for advertisers — the use of ad-blocking software grew by 48 percent over the past year, reaching an average of 45 million active monthly users between April and June. According to the report, that means 16 percent of the U.S. online population blocked ads during the spring and early summer.

    The sites hardest hit by ad-blocking software are ones that attract a young, tech-savvy audience, or have a more male audience. The report specifically calls out visitors to gaming sites as those who are “significantly more likely to block advertising.” Meanwhile, regular visitors to health, charity, and government sites are the least likely to block ads.

    Why this matters:

    Site publishers are in a bit of pickle right now. They depend on advertising that is offering declining returns, thus requiring increasing amounts of ads to make up the difference. At the same time, site visitors install ad blockers to deal with the increase in ads and prevent advertising networks from tracking them across the web. But if too many people block ads those sites will end up starved for funding. The challenge is to find a happy medium between acceptable types of advertising and returns that will pay staff and server costs.

    Mobile blocking on the horizon

    The ad-blocking trend is poised to get worse as it moves to mobile platforms. Right now, mobile ad blocking is an insignificant part of the ad blocking world, the report says. It’s possible to block ads on Android, thanks to the AdBlock Plus app and browser, as well as the AdBlock extension on Firefox for mobile.

    On iOS, however, ad blocking could get much bigger once iOS 9 rolls out with the Safari Content Blockers feature. This will allow users to install ad blockers for Safari on iOS — once developers build them.

    If iOS users turn to ad blockers in droves, that will have a significant impact on ad-based online revenue, especially in the U.S., where iOS makes up 44 percent of smartphone market share, according to comScore.

    While iOS may be the ad-blocking platform of the future, right now Google Chrome is the browser of choice for ad-blocking users, according to the Adobe and PageFair report. That’s ironic considering a large portion of Google’s income relies on web-based ads.
    The Hackmaster

  • #2
    I plainly have no interest in them. They slow down my internet and my computer by putting crap on it that loads each time. Some do their annoying thing of forcing you to wait entire minutes from page to page. Some do sneaky things like put horizontally stretch the ad enough that the X to close it in the top right corner is merged with the scroll bar so I can't close it and it takes up a big chunk of the page. I hate them. Some I click on because they look like something I'd go for, like an interesting webcomic site that leads to other goofy webcomic sites. Some are relevant, many have nothing to do with anything on the site they are on. There's a lot of scam ads too, I'd estimate that being far more than half of the ones I encounter.

    Go to a science website: Cure diabetes with this secret, cure baldness with this secret involving whatever unexpected common item because baldness hasn't been cured yet in you 20 year olds or anybody I guess, boost your testosterone, get this because everyone else is getting it and it's taking "randomly generated name place like Wal-Mart, McDonalds, Russia (not joking, page refresh with the same ad, different random place and I've seen those 3 before)" by storm because somehow there's something in common between these randomly generated places, blah blah bed secrets.

    If they want people to be more kind about the ad-blockers, make the obnoxious scammers go away and stop forcing people to watch pointless things in between every page, and stop resource bombing, not everyone has a supercomputer. It would definitely help. Now if the science site had ads that had some relevancy that maybe went to other similar sites, I might be interested. If it had something very interesting that wasn't a load of crap, I might be interested too.

    Some are resource heavy, not everyone has a top notch computer to be able to handle these 20 video ads scattered throughout a page you need to find and stop before they freeze your computer.

    If the crap is removed, people won't go so crazy over blocking them. I used to have dial-up internet for 10 years, pages took ages, which should be the slogan for ad blockers since it rhymes so well. Once Ad blockers came around, a page could go from "It's been over 15 minutes this is F@CKING BS, screw this place I'm not going to this site ever again!" to "Wow, under 30 seconds!?"

    When it's something like an ad at the end of a TEDTalk video, or maybe a few 1 minute ads between a Jon Stewart Daily Show episode it's not too bothersome. Maybe a couple banner ads, nothing too extreme. I might not click on them, but if they aren't in the way and not slowing me down at all, I wouldn't resort to something that just blocks everything in existence without discrimination.
    July 7, 2019

    https://www.4shared.com/s/fLf6qQ66Zee
    https://www.sendspace.com/file/jvsdbd

    Comment


    • #3
      I'm not going to click on any ad. I hate them with a passion. Long live Ad-Block and No Script!
      The Hackmaster

      Comment


      • #4
        I haven't seen ads in a long time. I use an ad blocker on firefox and it covers all the sites I go to. I don't miss ads at all. They viruses up my computer enough when I was younger. Now that I know better I don't want to see them.

        Comment


        • #5
          I don't know anyone that has EVER clicked on an ad unless it was an accident.

          And I don't know anyone who would even trust what an internet-ad says.

          But I guess if they keep putting ads, it's because someone's clicking them (by accident).

          Comment


          • #6
            Kind of related: http://www.smbc-comics.com/index.php?id=2490

            Click image for larger version

Name:	20120112.jpg
Views:	1
Size:	142.9 KB
ID:	162743

            I ended up finding that site through ads, it's better than gold.
            July 7, 2019

            https://www.4shared.com/s/fLf6qQ66Zee
            https://www.sendspace.com/file/jvsdbd

            Comment


            • #7
              It's indeed a problem because some websites don't limit the advertising on their pages, and it takes forever to close them. Also, it affects the performance of a platform, and that's why when I finally manage to develop my website, I'll limit the number of ads there, I struggle with error 500 already, so I don't need to make everything worse.

              Comment

              Working...
              X