Time Now: September 6, 2006, 8:13 am
Last Reset: September 5, 2006, 3:54 pm
Next Reset: September 6, 2006, 3:54 pm

Home » Comments » The GSHI

Total Comments: 219
Page 7 of 9

Rune

I pity the food.

ugetab

Far too reality based. A response to a familiar statement. You're still hooked on form letters and faulty known sayings.

Can't you be a little bit new in your responses? You lack so much new in your responses that I feel like filling in the gap you leave with your dry comments.

Gimme your sob story, and make it involve aliens from the planet Zobloret. Maybe just include a few well placed slices of cheese? A thumb tack? A few molecules sand where they shouldn't be?

Rune

Sticks with mud. Novel concept #1

Ugetab2

HORRAY! I laugh with you. I'm smiling just reading what I wrote. It's not out of ego, but actual enjoyment. It's so much fun to be creative in one's endeavors. It's also fun to go outside of my usual domain of merely explaining things. Think stuff up. Respond to my rant. Make it nonsense. Respond to a random poem instead of my post, and don't quote it. I don't care, just do Something so you're using your creativity.

You're so ungodly boring when you don't put any thought into how to make your posts interesting. It's like reading a book on ancient egyptian algebra with a translation book so you can understand it. It's monotony. It's more fun to read stuff I wrote, even though I know exactly what I'm reading. Drop your boring tendancies, and do something I won't anticipate for once. Look happy while you're doing something, or get brought to tears, or shower your monitor with affection, heck, tell me what kind of porn you look at when you respond. You're just such a stick in the mud. Do something. *taps the glass tank rune is in*

Rune

I laugh.

ugetab

Rune, just how many perspectives have you looked at in this situation?

Have you considered the users' point of views? How about our point of view? You've only been expressing your own point of view, not responding to ours. Are you that angry at our site? Maybe you're angry at us individually? Come on, tell us.

Do you just get cranky sometimes? Maybe you're feeling the urge to be dramatic, or you're in a somber mood. Does the debasement of our site give you warm fuzzy feelings because you think you're taking down an overall superior site?

Maybe you're too wrapped up in routine. You need to do something exciting, not stay in this rut you're in! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

EXCITEMENT! IMAGINATION! You need this! How many possible ways of describing us as inadiquate compared to you can you think up? Quit using the same old routines. You're BORING. You need to think outside the box, because this 'steady as a rock' offense is just not working. Get excited when you mock us! Show me you MEAN it! Be mean, cruel, and imaginative in your efforts. Enjoy them, for hell's sake! We're like fish in a barrel, and you're standing there with a gun to your hand, threatening to shoot if we don't open a dimensional portal.

You're getting so tiresome. Talking to you is like eating a breakfast of waffles for the 3rd week in a row. You need to be more spontaneous. You seem depressed, moody, and altogether unhappy. Why aren't you happy if you're having such fun trying to depress you enemies? Can't you at least pretend you're having fun? I know I'm having fun right now. I'm having fun just looking at how much fun you aren't having that you could be. At our expense, no less! Quit the old person act. You're probably less than 50, and you act like someone who doesn't put a lot of thought into how the very subject of hacking affects others. BANG. More spontaneity. More creativity. Less purpose. Quit being boring. Think about how people would feel if they saw you as a fraud with an old used-up ripoff that every con-man knows. Make something new out of this. You've been at this long enough for someone intelligent to make up 3 inventive plans of attack and execute all of them. A professional borer. Get out of that profession, rune of ruin, or ruined you will be.

hiro1112

And the award for most random comments goes to....

ADS rules.

Rune

You tell me hiro. You brought up the phallic imagery first. Missing your boyfriend, Ugetab?

Rune

It's funny how the worst offenders always accuse others for their crimes first, no?

2 billion served and counting.

hiro1112

You can't be gscentral as gscentral existed the same time your knockoff surfaced. I guess since I was once assosiated with gscentral I could rename GSHI to gscentral. But then they may confuse our site with yours which would be unfortunate. Yes you credited everyones codes, but you already had some up under your name, altought you claimed you didn't know anything about the game.

You are a real drama queen tho. Is it that time of the month Rune?

ugetab

Well, it so happens I've been discussing your stealing with others at GSHI for a while. That means my proof is as valid as yours.

Rune

GSCentral.org is GSCentral. Have you forgotten that I co-admined GameShark Central with Jim Reinhart 1998? If it isn't GSC, then not even the dead .com is GSC. A large number of our regulars are from .com.

Stomping my feet? Your expressions are rather primitive.

Don't discuss my skills with yours in the same sentence, let alone paragraph. I wouldn't want your reputation as a liar and a thief to have anything to do with my own.
I have looked through Breath of Fire 2 and no debug codes are credited to me. You are simply making this up and making yourself look bad, especially once the master files are back online on GSCentral.

I remember adding your Super Mario World NES codes and giving you credit over a year ago on .com.

Our logo is a red dragon, but considering how much else you've managed to lie about, I'm not surprised you bring up the empty red skulls.

Ugetab, I discussed the GSHI stealing codes from GSCentral with others as it was happening. That is proof enough. Go see a shrink, or better yet, I'll give you a freebie sometime.

hiro1112

Sorry pal, your site isn't gscentral. It's .org, or clone as I like to call it. It's a different site set up by you while gscentral was still around. You used a known name to draw attention to your site. And what action have you taken? Stomping your feet around ain't what I call taking action.

As for my skills, I would say we are on par. You have more codes, but it's only cause you had more tackled more games before I had the chance.

And the game code you stole was the breathe of fire 2 debug menu codes. Although I'm sure you stole plenty more. I remember a thread in gscentral where we were posting codes for Super Mario World NES and you popped in with questions of what the game was about. But according to the site you had posted a few codes for the game on the main site, which means since you never heard of the game you couldn't of hacked it either. The snake in your logo is pretty fitting to your personality I would say. And so are the empty skulls.

ugetab

You say we stole codes. You can't verify it.

You use the idea that we stole codes to justify you stealing codes. Hypocricy based on evidence you don't have.

You deny to comment on the idea that you don't have evidence to back up your claims of code stealing that you're using as a basis for being a hypocrite. Delusional or evasive thought processes.

You selectively comment on those issues that are easiest for you to explain, even when given a clear statement to respond to with a more relavent impact on the situation. Deceptive practice.

I think you have a psychosis, considering the amount of denial you have, your lack of lucidity, and your overall antisocial attitude to those who don't treat you with respect that you think you've earned by unjustifiably berating others. Need there be a more acute symptom of a mental dysfunction than the ones already described?

Rune

I watched the GSHI post codes GSCentral without our permission for weeks before taking action. Don't make up lame excuses hiro and expect people to believe such justifications. The codes were taken from GSCentral's archives long before any codes were taken from the GSHI. All of the codes taken as a consequence of the GSHI's actions as a whole were taken with proper credit given to the /original hacker/ of the codes.

GSCentral.org is what GSC.com was before Michael (Stinky613) started to take over the site back in 2000 with the new server. Michael and I were on great terms before 2001, but then it started to look like he had no interest in taking care of the site the way it used to be. Whether you like it or not, GSCentral.org is the modern version of GameShark Central from 1998.

This is where your reply gets vague. If you're referring to my SSBM Debug code, I spent a long time searching through SSBM's memory to find that code. About a week worth of scrolling through memory, making jot-notes of interesting things that I found along the way (ie. turning off collisions, various graphic mods, etc.). I have witnesses as well that were there when I first posted the debug code on gsc.com.

I have yet to see anything amazing from your attempts to hack codes, hiro, so don't deny that your skills are lacking when compared to others.

hiro1112

I can say I've put up codes from gscentral since gscentral died. I don't accept .clone as it's continuance, it's just a knockoff. So gscentrals codes are free domain cause they are dead. And thank God I did put some of them up. You just never know when Rune is gonna take his code database offline.

By the way Rune, I don't remember ever giving you permission to put my newest codes up, yet you contininue to do so. Sometimes not crediting them, I guess so you can say you found them around somewhere else or take credit for them yourself. I have asked that you not add my codes to your site anymore, and so has Ugetab. Hell, I remember hearing about how you tried to claim credit for some Debug code. Your past codes were always infinite lives/ammo/energy and shows you don't have the ability to rip thru the games code to find the deep hidden stuff.

KE

As far as I can tell those codes are properly credited. Or perhaps you are talking about gshi putting up codes from gscentral and including the proper credit?

When we noticed that gscentral was putting up codes from the gshi (and by that time adding proper credit, unlike before) I believe we assumed that gscentral would have no problem with us putting gscentral codes up on the gshi. Especially considering that we had asked you to stop doing so, and you refused. Is that not the case? Would you prefer that gscentral be able to put up codes from gshi, but for the reverse to not hold true?

Rune

http://www.thegshi.org/?s=v2&m=h&hid=205
http://www.thegshi.org/?s=v2&m=h&hid=288
http://www.thegshi.org/?s=v2&m=h&hid=178
http://www.thegshi.org/?s=v2&m=h&hid=82

Just to name a few.

!!!!

A lesser known Hacker

"It has... OMG RED FREAKING SKULLS HOW COOL I WAS ALSO SO INTO RED SKULLS WHEN I WAS

12!!! I believe most of us are no longer 12. The skulls do not look cool, or edgy, or "underground". "

Well, I recently turned 13, so I think it looks decent, and gets the job done.

And for what "KE" said, Ugetab does present a good case, and so do I.

KE

Wow, apparently ps2hits decided it would be fun to insert blank lines throughout my post. Strange.

KE

Ahh, this has been fun to watch.

Rune, apparently hiro's comment went right over your head. He was not claiming that GSHI added millions of codes! If you turn

your reading comprehension on and re-read what hiro said, you will see that he was commenting on how you claimed that gscentral

has added tons of codes recently, yet your database has been offline so no one can see them. He was saying it is the EQUIVALENT

of GSHI saying we added millions of codes but not letting anyone see them.

I see you are ragging on GSHI's layout. Let's take a look.

"Did you forget to do some graphics or is that beyond your site's abilities?"

Layouts do not need graphics in order to be functional or appealing. In fact, the improper use of them can detract from a site.

Let's look at gscentral for instance... It has... OMG RED FREAKING SKULLS HOW COOL I WAS ALSO SO INTO RED SKULLS WHEN I WAS

12!!! I believe most of us are no longer 12. The skulls do not look cool, or edgy, or "underground". They just look silly. GSHI

doesn't need red skulls or graphics that don't serve a purpose. The design is functional and aesthetic. I should also mention

that chuck norris and ingenious should never be in the same sentence. It's just an over-used lame internet meme that you

apparently whored out for april fools. Congrats.

I also see you going on about how you have a better code database, let's address that shall we? Yes, you probably have more

codes. However this is irrelevant. When GSHI was founded it was meant to be a place for hackers without a homepage to put their

codes so they wouldn't disappear in a forum prune. It was never the aim of GSHI to have a giant database of codes, and because

of that we had (and still have) no reason to steal codes.

If you look at the main page on GSHI you will see that right in the update news we give the name of the hacker that made the

codes. That is because instead of trying to be yet another big database of codes like gscentral, we are focused on showcasing

the works of individual hackers. To that end you can can actually sort codes by hacker instead of game or system.

And how about that code stealing? I have yet to see you actually address accusations of code stealing that have been laid

against you by hackers such as ugetab. Your response has basically amounted to "NO U!". You have yet to show credible, or even

specific evidence that someone at GSHI has stolen codes. You just make broad hazy claims without any backing or substance,

expecting that this will draw attention away from claims that were made against you first.

As a side note, it's nice to see you still ending your posts with cheesy lines ending in exclamation marks!

A lesser known hacker

And.. on another note, I can see that the past several updates have been just re-posts of official DS codes...

Rune

Just a billion? We have 2.2 billion!

A lesser known hacker

Okay, shut up ladies, Shad0w is here.

Now, Rune, please take the time to answer my questions. Taking the 1 and 1/2 minutes it takes will better your image in several peoples' minds, including mine.

Now, the games I mentioned [The codebreaker GBA, and the Tony Hawks Underground 1 and 2.], Who did you assign credit to, when you marked up the codes, to become postable on your site?

Okay, just so I can have some dirt, I have some links ready about some recent Codebreaker Codes I made for GBA at the GSHI. You see, because I post them in a forum, they will have a date and time.

P.S.: Why is your August 17th update up on August 15th?

ugetab

You added codes to a database that nobody can access to see proof of. Whee. I've got 2 million dollars that you can't prove I don't have. whee.

Our billion and a half new codes aren't for display purposes, as that would defy the entire purpose of announcing them on our publicly-visible database. We're not even going to post that we have them, as that, too, would be sharing. We just want to have them, and not let others see them.

Show Comments Per Page

Page 7 of 9
 Add Comment
Name
Email Address
Comments


Page generated in 0.0711 seconds & 4 queries. Server Load: 0.36